Aircooled Volkswagen Forum banner

Rod Penrose's New car project

46317 Views 291 Replies 69 Participants Last post by  twaluminum
4
Australian drag racer Rod Penrose is building a new bug body style race car!

To be on the track in 2009!







See less See more
1 - 20 of 292 Posts
So THATS whose car that is. :w00t:
Lenco baby!
those are old pics- it looked like that over a year ago- He bought some parts off me and had me send them to serrano- I wonder how he faired with that whole deal
From what i understand the project is back on again. Delays due to a change in the engine recipe from pauter. Something like $35K in custom engine, built for 1000hp. I believe he is chasing 7's. I'd personally like to see better. The dam rotaries from Pac performance over here are in the 6's now with their mazda MX6 bodies tube chassis car.
2443tt said:
The dam rotaries from Pac performance over here are in the 6's now with their mazda MX6 bodies tube chassis car.
Yeah and they are getting faster all of the time now with my buddies center plates.
I am progressing well with the new car and would like to keep this post up to date , however I cannot up load pic's so if somebody can help me it would be appreciated . I was originally opting for a twin turbo deal for my Autocraft engine and have now seen the light and the car will now be powered by a single turbo'd 3300cc Pauter modular engine . This engine is mounted , turbo mounted and the headder is finished . The intake manifolds have been fabricated and I am now researching an 'icebox' intercooler . I have purchased a cs3 3 speed airshifted Lenco from Tom Schuh and it is mated to the front mounted engine . Out back is a full aluminium modular 9'' unit from Strange engineering built to my spec's . I am building this car at home in my garage and all work so far has been fun . I am hoping this car will be close to hitting the track mid year and than learning to tune the chassis as I go , ROD.
Kinda looks like an Audi TT.

I like it!

FYI, on those ICEBOX intercoolers, they don't work. Make sure you make a seperate ice/water tank and circulate the water through the intercooler. Garrett Turbos makes the most efficient intercooler cores. Let me know if you need a name on a distributor/dealer.

Can't wait to see this one done!
Hey Chad, who says it dont work?, we have one on our Dragster, dropped the air intake temps down to 70 degrees, even though the ambient temp outside has been 120 degrees.... valves seats dont move like they use to, heads hold up better, car runs more consistently with it. Yes we still didnt run any faster then without the "ice pack", but we still dont have enough runs on it considering still finding the tune up for it as far as the fuel demand, added weight and other changes we made to the set up. (intercooler, fully loaded added 75 lbs, our 33.5x 17x 16 slicks with beadlocks added 40 lbs more rotating weight then our 33x 14 combo.. that alone added 115 lbs to the rear of our car) then , as we started to creep up on our tune up, we found out that our fuel pump was going bad all the time we were running. when we got it freshened up, it changed our WHOLE set up again, WAY TOO MUCH FUEL!!!., thus the performance at the 2007 Las Vegas Bug-in...on top of having to not run the intercooler.... but thats another story.
See less See more
6secondvw said:
Hey Chad, who says it dont work?, we have one on our Dragster, dropped the air intake temps down to 70 degrees, even though the ambient temp outside has been 120 degrees.... valves seats dont move like they use to, heads hold up better, car runs more consistently with it. Yes we still didnt run any faster then without the "ice pack", but we still dont have enough runs on it considering still finding the tune up for it as far as the fuel demand, added weight and other changes we made to the set up. (intercooler, fully loaded added 75 lbs, our 33.5x 17x 16 slicks with beadlocks added 40 lbs more rotating weight then our 33x 14 combo.. that alone added 115 lbs to the rear of our car) then , as we started to creep up on our tune up, we found out that our fuel pump was going bad all the time we were running. when we got it freshened up, it changed our WHOLE set up again, WAY TOO MUCH FUEL!!!., thus the performance at the 2007 Las Vegas Bug-in...on top of having to not run the intercooler.... but thats another story.
Are the issues you had (seats moving, heads not holding up, etc.) with a traditional air-to-water, seperate water tank, or with no intercooler at all? If you talk to the Garrett Engineers, they will tell you that an intercooler is going to be more efficient with ice water passing (flowing) through the cores. Obviously, race car construction is a game of compromises. In the dragster case, you have little/no room and weight is a concern. In the case of a door car, you have a little more to work with, and in the case of "small" tire cars (i.e. Outaw 10.5), a little extra weight over the rear is helpful. Plus, it makes a good place to put the trans-cooler.

Sorry guys, I guess I should have said "Don't work, as well..."
To cadprovw , I am interested to know your theory on why the ice box intercooler is not as efficient . I am looking at a core size of 20'' x 12'' x 5'' that will have enough space to use approx 36lb's of regular bagged ice , rather than use dry ice . I will be using methanol as a fuel and nitrous oxide for a little extra kick , all controlled by a Motec ecu . I am new at this technology and feel that if I have the extra weight from pumps/storage tanks and plumbing ect involved by having to recirculate cold water or fluid for the cooling process it would be a lot more of a headache . I would like to keep things as simple as possible and as light as possible to be able to make the car as fast as I can . An air to air cooler would only work efficient towards the end of a run , where as I am after maximum cooling from the begining of the run . I have obtained help from Garrett Australia for the GT 51R turbo and any other products they may have to help me build my car , and at this stage by having ice melting over and through a core seems to be the most effective way to cool the intake charge from start to finish . If you can direct me in a proven direction or another product that would be suitable for my needs that would be good , thanks ROD.
See less See more
when we were not using an intercooler, our air intake temps were around 375 to 410 degrees, as far as the situation about the cylinder heads, they required more attention because of the heat being generated not only by the engine being an air cooled, but by also the high air temps that passes through it caused by the hot weater conditions that we run at.(the only time we saw temps dropped significantly without the intercooler was when ambient air temps were in the 60's or lower....220- 140 degrees). As far as what you plan to run Rod, FYI, we run methanol for fuel, 90 hp shot af nitrous, single stage,with methanol(so far), an a combo of hilborne/waterman mechanical injection system at 40-44 psi of boost, the Lauffers also use methanol with a 2 stage nos system, but there set up is what your looking at, Motec efi system (wish i could afford that). Chad, i dont deny the fact that what you guys learned on the Bothwell's Garrett turbo mustang dont work, as a matter of fact that car kicks butt!, and also the engineers at Garrett are very knowlegable and obviously know what they are talking about because of what they do as far as r&d, but when you look at the fact that both the 2 fastest air cooled race cars in the world (also the 2 fastest EFI and Mechanical injected turbo aircooled opposed engines) both use "icepack" style intercoolers, you cant deny thats proof in the "pudding" so to speek, that the ice pack system is the way to go. Also i cannot see the difference between filling the top tank with 2 1/2 bags of ice, then filling it with 2 gallons of water and letting it sit with the ice waterthrough the core (drain tank on the bottom), is any different than having an ice holding tank,with a water pump to circulate it. In both cases you still have to drain the water after the run because the ice have melted then refill it prior to taking the next pass. Trust me I love those Garrett turbos, infact the next one i get will be one, but as far as i know, all their R&D an the killer racecars that they support have been watercooled 4,6 and 8 cylinder engines, not aircooled. correct me if not. :eek:k: :hrmm:
See less See more
6secondvw said:
but when you look at the fact that both the 2 fastest air cooled race cars in the world (also the 2 fastest EFI and Mechanical injected turbo aircooled opposed engines) both use "icepack" style intercoolers, you cant deny thats proof in the "pudding" so to speek, that the ice pack system is the way to go.
considering there the only two cars thats not exactly what i would call proof
Im not saying you wrong
Water can transfer heat much better than air. The problem with an ice packed box is there are air gaps which actually act as an insulator. Only portions of the ice touch the metal to transfer the heat. It can work fine but using an ice/water solution should be able to transfer more heat if designed right and move that heat away from the charge. As mentioned there are trade offs with any system. If one system can get the job done without adding things like complexity, weight, pumps etc then it probably makes sense to use it. If you put salt in the water you can even get a cooler water solution than 32F (0C) of course the Al isn't going to like the salt solution much.

Try putting some warm beers in a cooler and load it up with ice. In another I will put my warm beer in and fill it mostly with water then add ice. We will see who is drinking cold beer first! ;)
pfer10 said:
Water can transfer heat much better than air. The problem with an ice packed box is there are air gaps which actually act as an insulator. Only portions of the ice touch the metal to transfer the heat. It can work fine but using an ice/water solution should be able to transfer more heat if designed right and move that heat away from the charge. As mentioned there are trade offs with any system. If one system can get the job done without adding things like complexity, weight, pumps etc then it probably makes sense to use it. If you put salt in the water you can even get a cooler water solution than 32F (0C) of course the Al isn't going to like the salt solution much.

Try putting some warm beers in a cooler and load it up with ice. In another I will put my warm beer in and fill it mostly with water then add ice. We will see who is drinking cold beer first! ;)
no i do like the salt idea
anything to make a better working intercooler is kewl with me
i have thought about salt as well
the only thing i wonder about the salt is
even though its cooler
how does it affect the ice waters ability to absorb the heat
Heat only moves with a temperature gradient. The more the difference in the two temperatures the more heat that moves being that everything else stays the same.

I guess to make my point if you had a third cooler just like the second that had a pump that removed water from one end and put it back in at the other they would be drinking beer first. LOL
RodPenrose said:
To cadprovw , I am interested to know your theory on why the ice box intercooler is not as efficient .
I think pfer10 described it best. With the icebox setup, you have air pockets, which in turn creates "hot spots" on the cores. His beer/cooler example is a perfect illustration. All this leads to is inefficency. You actually need a little pressure to push the water through the hot spots, and the only way you get that is with a water pump. Also, on the ice box setup, you are relying on gravity to "pull" the water and ice through the core. This can be an issue in a situation like drag racing where g-load can affect how gravity works.

6secondVW: Yes, Garrett's engineering comes out of the V8 world (actually, it comes out of aviation...), but the air coming out of a turbo doesn't know if its on a V8, a/c VW, diesel, etc. The principles are going to be the same: to make a turbo setup as efficient as possible, you need to remove as much as the heat from the intake charge as possible. The seperate water tank setup is a more efficient way of doing it. Again, it comes back to compromises. For the dragster crowd, I completely understand. On a door car, you have more room to play with. I would like to see a real-world comparison between the 2 setups.

At least you and Rod are running an intercooler with the Alcohol setup.... that's a topic of much debate, and we can save that for another day...

BTW, are any of you automatic guys running your trans coolers in a water tank?
See less See more
1 - 20 of 292 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top